Critique of Judgment (Classic Reprint) Book

xviKANTS CRITIQUE OF JUDGEMENTBut as we reflect on our mental states we find that here no proper account has been given of the phenomena of feeling, which play so large a part in experience. And this Kant saw before he had proceeded very far with the Critique of Practical Reason ; and in consequence he adopted a threefold classification of the higher mental faculties based on that given by previous psychologists. JCnowledge, feeling, desire, these are the three ultimate modes of consciousness, of which the second has not yet been described. And when we compare this with the former triple division which we took up from the Aristotelian logic, we see that the parallelism is significant. Understanding is par excellence the faculty of knowledge, and Reason the faculty of desire (these points are developed in Kant's first two Critiques). And this suggests that the Judgement corresponds to the feeling of pleasure and pain ; it occupies a position intermediate between Understanding and RTable of Contents CONTENTS; PAGE; Editor's Introduction xi; Preface i; Introduction 7; i Of the division of Philosophy 7; 11 Of the realm of Philosophy in general 11; iii Of the Critique of Judgement as a means of combining; the two parts of Philosophy into a whole 14; iv Of Judgement as a faculty legislating a priori 17; v The principle of the formal purposiveness of nature; is a transcendental principle of Judgement 20; vi Of the combination of the feeling of pleasure wjjb; the concept of the purposiveness of nature 27; vu Of the aesthetical representation of the purposiveness; of nature 30; vim Of the logical representation of the purposiveness of; nature -35; ix Of the connexion of the legislation of Understanding; with that of Reason by means of the Judgement 39; First Part-Critique of the Aesthetical Judgement 43; First Division-Analytic of the Aesthetical Judgement 45; First Book-Analytic of the BeautifulRead More